I'd like to know how I can change the color on the buttons. I can't seem to find them anywhere in the folders.

twister said:

digitalman said:

I'd like to know how I can change the color on the buttons. I can't seem to find them anywhere in the folders.

---

 

I think you have to change it into library.fla, but is bugged now, so your final swf dosen't work, same thing for preloader

So you're telling me this program is online, and live, and it doesn't function at the most basic level?

How can these guys put a program up here that won't allow you the basic editing you need to finish out a template? You can't finalize anything with this program the way it is.

So I've wasted a week playing with a template I cant even finish until they get the bugs worked out? When exactly is that going to be? 

ANSWER PEOPLES QUESTIONS PLEASE.  IS THIS REALLY SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND?

twister said:

I don't know i'm a user like you, i just have see that for the template i use (music band) the graphic parts are into library.swf, the source is library.fla but if i take those .fla i make my modify i'm exporting in swf nothing works, the problem was that if i simply open the .fla and export in swf i have the same problem, i have sent my .fla to the developer that reply me i have deleted copyright movie, but those damned movie aren't in original source file gived for customization, so, for me is bugged, i don't know if is bugged the relaese, the library, all the pject, i'm waiting an answer by 2 days just like you…

Thanks for your help Twister. It's pretty sad when clients are having to answer questions the developers won't. Not sure how these people think this program is going to get anything other than terrible reviews when this is how they treat their testers.

Been through numerous things like this, and I'm sorry, but these guys are the absolute worst I've seen at communication, updates and answering questions. 

Good luck. I'll check occasionally to see if they make any progress, but at this point, the program annoys me more than its beneficial. Still can't believe they have a program up here that doesn't even work… but when it takes someone 3 days to answer a simple question i don't imagine this project is going anywhere soon.

Basic editing DOES NOT work fine in this program, so stop stating things like that. The functionality of this program is barely there. Yes… you can work around lots of issues, but some cannot be worked around like this ~banner issue in the fashion template.

Not to mention, WHY should I have to work around these issues? The whole purpose of a Content Management System… is to MANAGE content. If I can't access files, folders or assets through your program… IT IS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY and SHOULD NOT BE UP HERE. I wonder if the Open Source community is aware of how these guys  are dealing with people. I'm certain there are standards even for open source, and I cannot see how these guys are not in violation. Putting a non functional program up, and then refusing to address blatant issues being brought up is nonsense.

These guys need to step it up and start communicating. This is ridiculous.

Atix said:

Hi everyone, pretty exciting conversation here . Just want to advise some of you guys to be less agressive(emotional?) and browse the library with more attention Otherwize it sounds like an old joke when a user asks hacker where is the error, haha!

btw. check it out http://iamcool.site90.net/

Now the question. How the hell can I move the title closer next to the logo? Any ideas?

Well… it would be real easy to be less aggressive, or emotional if SOMEONE would bother replying to things on this forum. You can tell people to be less emotional, but the fact remains that most people attempting to create something such as this program, would not ignore the people testing and reporting issues. How the hell do you expect to resolve problems if you won't even address the issues being mentioned?

Nothing is more frustrating, and annoying then when devs pull nonsense like this. I could care less if they didn't have an answer… just have the courtesy to get up here and state that. Why bother telling people to post issues on the forum… and then never address the issue posted?

Most devs stay in constant contact with the forums in order to keep up on the issues. If these guys are actually taking this seriously and not working on it once a month… then they need to start addressing the issues being listed.

This is the internet in case they forgot. A couple of big blogs could ruin a program like this if people stated more problems than it was worth… or do these guys not care about publicity? I would imagine they should if they intend on actually selling anything associated with this program.

I am probably one of the loudest critics of this program, and I still maintain it can be an excellent piece pf software if they would just get the simple bugs worked out. These's no reason the media library is not functional. Theres no reason why you can't access files and loaders without jumping through hoops, and unless you plan on opening your website in 3 different programs, you can't edit anything other than simple text items, and images sets.